db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: !$!% derbyall
Date Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:50:36 GMT
Thanks, Dyre, good info.

I was running with 393331

I'll try nice, I was surprised to find it available on Cygwin.

David

Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM wrote:
> "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM> writes:
> 
> 
>>Thanks for your tips and concern, all.
>>
>>Mike: I remember that it used to take me four hours a few weeks ago, and 
>>I didn't have these CPU issues, but this latest run broke all records. 
>>My laptop is pretty good -- I upgraded specifically so I could run 
>>derbyall on it and keep working, but for some reason yesterday it was 
>>just killing me.
> 
> 
> Do you happen to know the exact revision you were running?
> 
> From
> http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Derby/index.html/derbyall_history.html
> 
> it looks like r392019 and r392564 took a long time, up to 2.5
> times the baseline on some platforms.
> 
> A general observation is that the running time seems to increase with
> the number of failures.
> 
> I try to run derbyall with nice. It usually doesn't take much longer,
> AND my machine is usable, even during stress.multi.
> 

Mime
View raw message