Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69407 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2006 21:16:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2006 21:16:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 26478 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2006 21:16:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 26447 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2006 21:16:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 26438 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2006 21:16:43 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:16:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mcintyre.a@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.185] (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:16:43 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q29so690526nfc for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:16:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KmlTELdDJ3UQGH4m99BbiudWZ0PHh2yZoAiyCPTFp/gSZf7gyHX4EoVGQkB6gEpvs4l1Zea40U0MbpdPQJRUbdVYygwA+SzbSxnMmtsFd8XmpYcnBHiHZmvBZyIP7gMzYK5YlYuYyFeI+eQLH12b86qgFEIlO2PoycK2ZGsYGN0= Received: by 10.49.54.8 with SMTP id g8mr77118nfk; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.14.15 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:16:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54ac72d70603311316t31ff55e3xf8a24cf721d7ef67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:16:21 -0800 From: "Andrew McIntyre" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Regression checkbox (was Re: Can we change SQL State?) In-Reply-To: <54ac72d70603311245l1be87e71me421722f8fd0fdaa@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <54ac72d70603311245l1be87e71me421722f8fd0fdaa@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/31/06, Andrew McIntyre wrote: > > I had misunderstood Kathey's request earlier. I agree that checkboxes > for this behavior would be good to have to flag issues as regressive > behavior, with an additional checkbox for release notes impact, and > leaving the Regression Test Failure component specifically for test > failures. Sorry for the JIRA blast, I needed to move the issues with Patch Available to a new custom field so that we could add additional checkboxes. But, seems like a good opportunity for the committers to review the issues with patches available. andrew