Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40297 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2006 00:29:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2006 00:29:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19588 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 00:29:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 19551 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 00:29:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 19535 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2006 00:29:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:29:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mcintyre.a@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:29:17 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l37so457141nfc for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:28:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XB7kBhQwxtgQif1gdC+ujXzBDruWYgl7ln0EYCo8bLvJZj7braqRSXMy5U0KFZQ3Jk02ZBenehfHHBELkI2rMbxVzH5UMNH0O8GPdQF7/zVB8eoqASZjumif3Ki/gJIlDIzC88PbZQYe5YI0HO3MD+c2lE9dA1FyCdC58ZvNfLI= Received: by 10.48.237.15 with SMTP id k15mr834667nfh; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:28:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.14.15 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:28:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54ac72d70603231628n70b6e26fo357ea75762103008@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:28:55 -0800 From: "Andrew McIntyre" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: IRC chat summary In-Reply-To: <44233AA7.4030109@sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <17443.14675.357553.540531@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <44233AA7.4030109@sun.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/23/06, David W. Van Couvering wrote: > Maybe we could in the past, when we had fewer bugs and fewer > contributions, but now perhaps we need a longer stabilization period. > Maybe a release criteria could include a reduction in bugs by a certain > percentage. The release criteria are decided by the release manager. If they want to have such a criteria, it's up to them. I tend to think it will happen naturally, though. Members of the community will peruse the bug list, or know off-hand which issues remain after their features are all checked in and will help to adjust the bug list targeted for the release accordingly. As such, I tend to think the best criteria for release is "when it's ready.= " :-) andrew