Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mcintyre.a@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.200 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Muh9cuIYsjBlg0RebVVjt1bQmjYu+6f2MD18i2+OXGoA2Is6svNv42Exb0SLYmQuoSYxdUqCIGP7XzS87XYTA/HGcTo7TtH3rg8VmH/XLgkimDl6xPLKsZk6iHza/Xrg6aVJWBHLmknXctRiaiKQbu4DTTZXC4LJIoL6rcJiVzQ=
Message-ID: <54ac72d70603091218v4d74d6b8ra79d3e9e02353036@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:18:03 -0800
From: "Andrew McIntyre" <mcintyre.a@gmail.com>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: 10.1.2.3 vs 10.1.2.4
In-Reply-To: <441088EF.1020103@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1147591648.1141930960305.JavaMail.jira@ajax>
	 <441086A2.6080600@apache.org>
	 <54ac72d70603091155t50387688xc36248202c91fa17@mail.gmail.com>
	 <441088EF.1020103@apache.org>

On 3/9/06, Daniel John Debrunner <djd@apache.org> wrote:
>
> That's fine bumping the version number, but there has not been a
> 10.1.2.3 release. So I don't think 10.1.2.3 be in the release products
> section of Jira?

I had just been marking the release flag for the snapshot versions so
that it sorted nicely in the edit/comment screens. If you feel that
listing 10.1.2.3 in the released products section is deceptive, I'll
uncheck the flag. After looking around quite a bit, I can't actually
find anyplace where the release is described as a snapshot other than
the description field where I entered it in the admin screens, so I
can understand that position.

But, neither do I like the idea of JIRA filling up with dozens of
unreleased versions. But, I guess we can archive old versions once
there's really no activity around them, so I don't have particularly
strong feelings about that, either. E.g. we should probably archive
the 10.0 versions around the time 10.3 is released. Archiving the
version in JIRA just means it no longer shows up in the edit screens.

andrew