Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <440735C5.3050100@wiu.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 12:13:25 -0600
From: scott hutinger <S-Hutinger@wiu.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: Derby HTML book manuals - invalid anchors in TOC? (DERBY-753)
References: <4402FD37.8070505@Sun.com> <440306E6.2030602@Sun.COM>
In-Reply-To: <440306E6.2030602@Sun.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I haven't looked at that file, but looking at the fop output, in the 
getstarted file, bookmarks exist, which are not supported (from what I 
saw) in the fo2xhtml.xsl file.

<fo:block margin-left="9pc" text-align-last="justify">
<fo:basic-link internal-destination="tgsrunningij">Running ij<fo:leader 
leader-pattern="dots"/>
<fo:page-number-citation ref-id="N105D5"/>
</fo:basic-link>
</fo:block>

You will find that the basic-link doesn't have any internal-destination, 
although it does have the page-number-citation ref-id.

<fox:bookmark internal-destination="N105D6">
<fox:label>Running ij</fox:label>
</fox:bookmark>

<fo:inline id="N105D6"/>Running ij</fo:block>

Although I think it has a off-by-one error in the fo:block with the 
basic-link and the page-number-citation ref-id, which I am fairly 
certain at one time or another, some of the dita transforms were off by 
1.  So it looks like if we used the bookmarks (implemented them in 
fo2html.xsl) then the links would work.  Sound reasonable?

This is just a quick fix, and I haven't looked at it enough to make sure 
it works, it just looks like it would.  More than likely, some other 
items need fixed in the transform to fop, which should be fixed first.

scott


John Embretsen wrote:
> Kristian Waagan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some time ago I created DERBY-753 
>> (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-753), but there has not 
>> been any activity on it since then. It says that the links in the 
>> table of contents of the HTML book manuals do not work.
>>
>> Can anyone confirm that the problem (still) exists?
>
> I can confirm that the problem still exists with the 10.2 reference 
> manual. I have not tried the others.
>
> I also tried the link (from the Jira issue) that was supposed to work, 
> but it did not work either. I.e.:
>
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/ref-single.html#crefsqlj95081
>
> does not work;
>
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/ref-single.html#N1223F
>
> does not work; but
>
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/ref-single.html#N1227F
>
> works.
>
>