Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97147 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2006 22:03:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2006 22:03:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 47692 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2006 22:03:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 47661 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2006 22:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 47652 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2006 22:03:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:03:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:03:16 -0800 Received: from ajax (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E22D49FE for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:02:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1892072670.1142978575132.JavaMail.jira@ajax> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:02:55 +0000 (GMT) From: "David Van Couvering (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1090) Implement Connection.isValid as defined by JDBC4 In-Reply-To: <1632067244.1141853139141.JavaMail.jira@ajax> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1090?page=comments#action_12371312 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1090: -------------------------------------------- Hi, Olav. It's not clear to me what a committer needs to do with this patch. You have checked the box saying you intend it for inclusion to the project, but you also say other, alternate patches are on the way. Do you want a committer to commit this, or is it just for review? > Implement Connection.isValid as defined by JDBC4 > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-1090 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1090 > Project: Derby > Type: Sub-task > Components: JDBC > Reporter: Olav Sandstaa > Assignee: Olav Sandstaa > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 10.2.0.0 > Attachments: embedded1090-query.diff > > The Javadoc for JDBC4 says this about Connection.isValid: > boolean isValid(int timeout) throws SQLException > Returns true if the connection has not been closed and is still valid. The driver shall submit a query on the connection or use some other mechanism that positively verifies the connection is still valid when this method is called. > The query submitted by the driver to validate the connection shall be executed in the context of the current transaction. > Parameters: timeout - - The time in seconds to wait for the database operation used to validate the connection to complete. If the timeout period expires before the operation completes, this method returns false. A value of 0 indicates a timeout is not applied to the database operation. > Returns: true if the connection is valid, false otherwise -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira