Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60190 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2006 17:34:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2006 17:34:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 36231 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2006 17:34:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 36149 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2006 17:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 35914 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2006 17:34:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:34:54 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:34:53 -0800 Received: from ajax (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742A9D4A02 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:34:32 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1630616963.1142616872465.JavaMail.jira@ajax> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:34:32 +0000 (GMT) From: "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1093) Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedures() JDBC4 compliant In-Reply-To: <245123412.1141912839245.JavaMail.jira@ajax> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093?page=comments#action_12370849 ] Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1093: --------------------------------------- Please wait to commit this patch until the current issues with ugprade and metadata have been identified and there is community concensus on how to approach for 10.2. This change affects metadata.java which impacts the upgrade tests and makes the current task of identifying the issues that exist even more difficult. Relevant issues are: DERBY-1076, DERBY-1107, DERBY-1120, DERBY-1075. > Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedures() JDBC4 compliant > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-1093 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093 > Project: Derby > Type: Sub-task > Components: JDBC, Newcomer > Versions: 10.2.0.0 > Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll > Assignee: Dyre Tjeldvoll > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 10.2.0.0 > Attachments: derby-1093.v1.diff, derby-1093.v1.stat, derbyall_report.txt, upgrade.txt > > JDBC 4.0 requires that the result set returned from getProcedures must contain a new column SPECIFIC_NAME"and that the result set must be ordered by > PROCEDURE_SCHEM, PROCEDURE_NAME and SPECIFIC_ NAME. > The SYSALIASES table already has a column called SPECIFICNAME, so it should only be necessary to modify the query in metadata.properties. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira