db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dyre.Tjeldv...@Sun.COM
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1093) Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedures() JDBC4 compliant
Date Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:29:49 GMT
Deepa Remesh <dremesh@gmail.com> writes:

> On 3/16/06, Dyre Tjeldvoll (JIRA) <derby-dev@db.apache.org> wrote:
>>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093?page=all ]
>>
>> Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1093:
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>>     Attachment: upgrade.txt
>>
>> Based on the information in DERBY-573 I have run the runphases script to test upgrade.
But I don't really understand the output (there's a lot of it) since it contains both "PASS"
and "FAIL" and exceptions... I have attached the output here, so hopefully someone can have
a look at it and tell me if there are any problems...
>
> Currently, we have to compare the output to the master file
> phaseTester.out. Unfortunately, there are a lot of existing diffs when
> you run this test with the trunk. There is a diff file attached to
> DERBY-1076 which shows the exisiting diffs. It would be great if you
> can take a look at this. It may not be easy to look through these
> diffs since there are quite a few. I will also try to take a look at
> your output and post to the jira if I find anything.

OK, thanks for the explanation :) I just saw another mail describing
how the phaseTester master actually depends on the master for
metadata.java. And since I have updated this master (the
patch requires it) I cannot expect the phaseTester to run cleanly
(even modulo the diffs described in DERBY-1076)... 

So there is not much point for you to look at the output either... 

But thanks again for taking the time to explain this :)

-- 
dt


Mime
View raw message