db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Knut Anders Hatlen <Knut.Hat...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [doc: System stored procedures] WAS: Should we vote on it?
Date Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:52:30 GMT
Jeff Levitt <derby@mylevita.com> writes:

> --- "David W. Van Couvering"
> <David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM> wrote:
> <snip>
>> 
>> Dumb question: are system stored procedures in the
>> user documentation? 
>> If not, perhaps they should be Private Stable rather
>> than Stable?  If 
>> they're not documented, what is driving the
>> requirement that they be 
>> stable - client/server compatibility?
> </snip>
>
> Is this what you were looking for David?  This is in
> the Reference Manual:
>
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/crefsqlbuiltinsystemprocedures.html

These are not the only system procedures. The ones in the SYSIBM
schema are not documented, but they should be stable as well so that
we don't break client/server compatibility.

-- 
Knut Anders

Mime
View raw message