db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Should we vote on it? (was Re: Discussion (in preparation for a vote) on interface stability table)
Date Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:34:56 GMT
OK, I'm game for marking environment variables and directory hierarchy 

Any comments on the stability for SQLStates?


Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> On 3/30/06, David W. Van Couvering <David.Vancouvering@sun.com> wrote:
>> > Just on first glance the table is fairly restrictive, but generally
>> > looks good. I would think that environment variables and install
>> > directory hierarchy would be marked unstable, since it seems
>> > reasonable that we could change our use of environment variables
>> > (since they're only used in the scripts) or move things around in the
>> > distributions between minor releases.
>>Isn't it possible that scripts written by our users would also make use
>>of (e.g. set) environment variables and depend on the install directory
>>hierarchy?  That said, as long as we're clear as to how stable these
>>interfaces are, our users can be made aware of that and take the
>>necessary precautions (like define directory paths in a variable rather
>>than hardcode them).
> I don't think much change will actually be happening to either the
> variables or layout, I just don't think it is unreasonable to be able
> to change them significantly, if we wanted to, in a minor release,
> since they are not "core" APIs as such. I would certainly expect them
> to remain stable for maintenance/point releases, though.
> andrew

View raw message