db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andreas Korneliussen <Andreas.Kornelius...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1093) Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedures() JDBC4 compliant
Date Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:41:40 GMT
Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM wrote:
> Deepa Remesh <dremesh@gmail.com> writes:
>>On 3/16/06, Dyre Tjeldvoll (JIRA) <derby-dev@db.apache.org> wrote:
>>>     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093?page=all ]
>>>Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1093:
>>>    Attachment: upgrade.txt
>>>Based on the information in DERBY-573 I have run the runphases script to test
upgrade. But I don't really understand the output (there's a lot of it) since it contains
both "PASS" and "FAIL" and exceptions... I have attached the output here, so hopefully someone
can have a look at it and tell me if there are any problems...
>>Currently, we have to compare the output to the master file
>>phaseTester.out. Unfortunately, there are a lot of existing diffs when
>>you run this test with the trunk. There is a diff file attached to
>>DERBY-1076 which shows the exisiting diffs. It would be great if you
>>can take a look at this. It may not be easy to look through these
>>diffs since there are quite a few. I will also try to take a look at
>>your output and post to the jira if I find anything.
> OK, thanks for the explanation :) I just saw another mail describing
> how the phaseTester master actually depends on the master for
> metadata.java. And since I have updated this master (the
> patch requires it) I cannot expect the phaseTester to run cleanly
> (even modulo the diffs described in DERBY-1076)... 

I have run the phaseTester on a clean build. The output from phaseTester 
was not comparable with the phaseTester.out file, it contained many 
additional failures.

I also found that phase tester gives different output dependent on which 
version of Derby 10.1 you upgrade from.


View raw message