db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Levitt <de...@mylevita.com>
Subject Re: [doc] future docs
Date Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:51:04 GMT


--- scott hutinger <s-hutinger@wiu.edu> wrote:

> Jeff Levitt wrote:
> > --- scott hutinger <s-hutinger@wiu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Since bookmarks and TOC (in url form) sort of
> clash,
> >> any good ideas 
> >> about where to put links (not bookmarks).
> >>
> >> I am thinking it might be wise to jump up to the
> >> DITA-2.1 beta (except 
> >> for the build).  Although my initial
> investigation
> >> into this showed a 
> >> difference in the globals that we use, which
> broke
> >> the build.  Hopefully 
> >> it will fix some of the broken items, as xslt
> gets a
> >> bit messy (to me).  
> >> Also the FOP changes coming down the pipeline
> seem
> >> to have a direct 
> >> impact on what direction (I take) with fixes (ie
> TOC
> >> (table of contents)).
> >>
> >> Currently my build at work is having problems
> >> (linux) from a fresh co 
> >> yesterday.
> >>
> >> Any ideas on the best method to do the switch?  I
> >> still have some 
> >> changes that haven't been incorporated into the
> >> build, and are hanging 
> >> around somewhere.  Possibly a working svn branch?
> 
> >> XSLT debugging is 
> >> sometimes a pain to setup; depending on the build
> >> target...
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> scott
> >>
> >>     
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > I've played around with the DITA 1.2 (not 2.1, its
> the
> > other way around) :)  a little bit these past few
> > weeks.  There are some problems with the java
> files in
> > it that they have submitted patches for, but you
> need
> > to get the dita source files, apply the patch, and
> > recompile in order to get it working.  Otherwise,
> the
> > toolkit doesnt build our Derby project.
> >
> > I agree that we should move to 1.2 though, as soon
> as
> > they release a binary distribution that includes
> the
> > patches.  1.2 handles links a lot better, as you
> > stated, and it moves us closer and closer to not
> > having to mod the xsl file each time.
> >
> >   
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> Are those (or that) patch on the DITA-OT public
> patches?  If not, could 
> you send me the patch?
> Yes, 1.2 (not 2.1).  Sometimes I jump too far :-)  I
> don't have a 
> problem with re-building something, as that's the
> norm isn't it? (just 
> kidding).  I'll look at the patches at DITA-OT...
> 
> thanks,
> scott
> 

Hey Scott,

Here is the link to the info about the bug and the
download for the patch they supplied to it.  This is
exactly the bug I get when I try to build derby docs
using the 1.2 binaries.

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1431229&group_id=132728&atid=725074




Mime
View raw message