db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "A B (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1093) Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedures() JDBC4 compliant
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:25:58 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093?page=comments#action_12370706 ] 

A B commented on DERBY-1093:
----------------------------

> Would it be ok if I go with option 1), for now, but create a new JIRA 
> for the change to ODBCMetadataGenerator ? I might even try to fix it 
> myself at some point, but right now I would like to limit the scope of 
> this patch if at all possible.

Sure, that sounds fair to me.

> Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedures() JDBC4 compliant
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-1093
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Sub-task
>   Components: JDBC, Newcomer
>     Versions: 10.2.0.0
>     Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll
>     Assignee: Dyre Tjeldvoll
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>  Attachments: upgrade.txt
>
> JDBC 4.0 requires that the result set returned from getProcedures must contain a new
column SPECIFIC_NAME"and that the result set must be ordered by
> PROCEDURE_SCHEM, PROCEDURE_NAME and SPECIFIC_ NAME.
> The SYSALIASES table already has a column called SPECIFICNAME, so it should only be necessary
to modify the query in metadata.properties.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message