db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Matrigali (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1068) change of store contract: online compress operations should not share any locks with user transactions
Date Tue, 07 Mar 2006 01:15:31 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1068?page=all ]

Mike Matrigali reassigned DERBY-1068:
-------------------------------------

    Assign To: Mike Matrigali

> change of store contract: online compress operations should not share any locks with
user transactions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-1068
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1068
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Store
>     Reporter: Andreas Korneliussen
>     Assignee: Mike Matrigali
>     Priority: Minor

>
> Propose to add the following to the store contract:
> * truncate and compress requires exclusive table locking
> * the truncate, purge and compress operations do not share any locks with user transactions

> Currently the store implementation allows users to share locks in truncate and possibly
purge.
> This request is driven by:
> http://www.nabble.com/conflict-detection-strategies-t1120376.html#a2938142
> and:
> http://www.nabble.com/RowLocation-contract-from-storage-engine-t1142235.html#a2994156

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message