Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83510 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2006 20:13:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2006 20:13:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 54957 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2006 20:13:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 54926 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2006 20:13:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 54917 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2006 20:13:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:13:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.98.31] (HELO brmea-mail-1.sun.com) (192.18.98.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:13:05 -0800 Received: from phys-epost-1 ([129.159.136.14]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k18KCiSD003071 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:12:44 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion-daemon.epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com by epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) id <0IUD00001XFMYQ@epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com> (original mail from Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM) for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:12:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from khepri29.sun.com (khepri29.Norway.Sun.COM [129.159.112.241]) by epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IUD00CZ5XH7UP@epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:12:44 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:12:43 +0100 From: Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM Subject: Re: Regression Test Harness handling of "duration" field In-reply-to: <43EA38FD.1050003@amberpoint.com> To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.2 (usg-unix-v) References: <43E9ED78.6080405@Sun.COM> <43EA1B74.1030008@amberpoint.com> <43EA2780.9060407@MultiNet.no> <43EA2C22.3020304@amberpoint.com> <43EA36ED.3020200@sun.com> <43EA38FD.1050003@amberpoint.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>>>> "BP" == Bryan Pendleton writes: BP> David W. Van Couvering wrote: >> My understanding it's the wall clock time. >>> derbyall 630 6 624 0 >>> Duration 45.6% BP> OK. So it's saying that this particular run of 'derbyall' BP> took 46.2% of the wall clock time that 'derbyall' took BP> on August 2, 2005. BP> That makes sense. BP> Given that this particular run failed badly, we probably BP> don't care about the Durations, then. BP> But in general, we'd probably want to keep our eyes open BP> for Duration values that started to get significantly BP> higher than 100%, because that would mean that we might BP> have accidentally introduced a performance regression. BP> Perhaps we could have some sort of trigger, so that if a BP> suite experienced a duration of, say, 150%, that was BP> treated as a regression failure, even if all the tests in BP> that suite passed? Given that the "Derby way" requires all bug fixes to be accompanied with a regression test that tests that the bug has not been re-introduced, AND that all such regression tests should be a part of derbyall (this is what I've been told, if it is not correct, please let me know), it should only be a matter of time before your trigger fires. Unless you create a new baseline regularly, of course... -- dt