Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of dremesh@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.196 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=mA9/0c2uqwmataUq2WxjGCayzpA2H3fOU1bh5jynJMXiBDuoYIP0Kxb8P0Sc4bpmKGrp2bhQ42h/sBEMgYiA2AIV/L086BXjGUqAUYD7QnFqgi8GAt/etqxhI+zDucXOlJK/qnMRmFx1BK6PjZW+cQnL4YV1uJJ3CSi1thHl/Zc=
Message-ID: <58ed70f50602170839k3b8fc861g92f1ae9331562cc8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:39:10 -0800
From: Deepa Remesh <dremesh@gmail.com>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-614) Execution failed because of a
 Distributed Protocol Error
In-Reply-To: <779773027.1140192567656.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1808526442.1128980987760.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
	 <779773027.1140192567656.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>

On 2/17/06, Kathey Marsden (JIRA) <derby-dev@db.apache.org> wrote:
>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-614?page=3Dall ]
>
> Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-614:
> ---------------------------------
>
>     Other Info:   (was: [Patch available])
>
> I committed this change.  I noticed there is other state that is not rese=
t in closed. Perhaps it is guaranteed to be initialized, I don't know.  May=
be another Jira  entry to make sure the other state is reset would be good.

I had checked all the DRDAResultSet states get initialized when
re-used. If they are not in close, they get initialized in some other
DRDAStatement methods - like addResultSet, setRsDefaultOptions,
setOPNQRYOptions, setQueryOptions etc. I will open a JIRA and post my
observations there so that this can be rechecked. I think it will be
good to add reset for all states in close() method so that we don't
miss anything by any other code changes.