Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59613 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2006 17:32:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2006 17:32:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 87328 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2006 17:32:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 87077 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2006 17:32:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 87068 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2006 17:32:34 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:32:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.145] (HELO e5.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:32:34 -0800 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1AHWDEw026081 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:32:13 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id k1AHWD4C175814 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:32:13 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1AHWC7f025025 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:32:12 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-114-10.mts.ibm.com [9.48.114.10]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1AHWBOu024412 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:32:12 -0500 Message-ID: <43ECCE0F.4080008@sbcglobal.net> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:31:59 -0800 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: DERBY-273, owner Tomohito Nakayama, Is it time to move this test out of the nightly regression suite? References: <43EBC409.9080106@sbcglobal.net> <43EBD6CD.6010405@sbcglobal.net> <43ECC302.30802@basil.ocn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <43ECC302.30802@basil.ocn.ne.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N TomohitoNakayama wrote: > Hello. > > About this issue, I think we should be very careful about removing any > sign of problem... > > My intention is to add test implemented by DERBY-511, compensating for > ignoring shutting down exception in DERBY-273. > > My position was watching response of other persons for DERBY-511 ... > Well ... There were almost no response . > DERBY-511 was not on my radar at all. Checking in a separate test for this seems like a great idea so I say go ahead. I won't have time to review it today. With or without DERBY-511, for DERBY-273, suppressing the console output is much better than disabling the entire test as has been proposed. Kathey