Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21901 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2006 13:22:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2006 13:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 46880 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2006 13:15:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46799 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2006 13:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46790 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2006 13:15:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:15:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.142] (HELO e2.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:15:38 -0800 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k17DFHKk023236 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:15:17 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id k17DFG9P212904 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:15:16 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k17DFGqm003345 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:15:16 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-116-109.mts.ibm.com [9.48.116.109]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k17DFESL003189 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:15:16 -0500 Message-ID: <43E89D5E.3010804@sbcglobal.net> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:15:10 -0800 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: [patch] cleanup of org.apache.derby.iapi.services.cache.ClassSize References: <43E721C5.2050305@it.fts-vn.com> <43E7764D.1080605@sun.com> <43E805BC.2090909@it.fts-vn.com> <43E8205D.1070802@apache.org> <43E825D6.3080400@it.fts-vn.com> <43E829FC.7050903@apache.org> <43E82E34.9090704@it.fts-vn.com> In-Reply-To: <43E82E34.9090704@it.fts-vn.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Kev Jackson wrote: > >> Right, and Derby has not chosen either of those styles, the text is >> correct in saying *individuals* have found those guides helpful. >> >> > > Ah ok, so not that these are the only style guides that contributors > should follow, I should read more carefully > Shortly after the client contribution, Jeremy changed all the client files to have a uniform style. I have recently been thinking that I would like to see the Network Server code on the trunk and 10.1 changed to match client, especially since many changes include client and server modifications and we may be able to share code in the future. We could pick some weekend in a few weeks and see if Jeremy would be willing to make a pass of the drda tree, which is not really that many files. We spend too much time messing with this issue. Thoughts? Question. Was client made to match the Geronimo style http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/CodingStandards? If so we can just point to that for client and network server. Kathey P.S. I have no opinion about the other code.