db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deepa Remesh <drem...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-210) Network Server will leak prepared statements if not explicitly closed by the user until the connection is closed
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:21:00 GMT
> What's the right thing to do here? Should we re-open DERBY-614 and
> have me work on that as a separate item? Or is it adequate just to
> include
>    splitQRYDTA = null;
> in your changes for DERBY-210?
> I suspect that the change really belongs with DERBY-614, but it's
> going to be a blocker for you and it will take me some time to
> develop and test a completely separate patch with focused repro, etc.
> What do you suggest?

I think it would be better to do it as part of DERBY-614 since it
belongs there. In case we need to port DERBY-614 to 10.1, all changes
will be in one place. Since it is clear that the field needs to be
reset and the overhead of making a repro is so signifcant, I don't
think we need a separate test for this. We will need to run the test
suites to just confirm this does not break anything. If this is okay,
I can create a patch and upload it to DERBY-614.


View raw message