db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernt M. Johnsen" <Bernt.John...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-591) Several builtin functions are incorrectly exposed through the JDBC escaped function syntax {fn <function_call>}
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:56:37 GMT
Moves to the mailing list.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote (2006-02-10
>     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-591?page=comments#action_12365900 ]

> Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-591:
> ---------------------------------------------
> Not sure what you are asking here Bernt. This is a bug reporting
> that several Derby functions are incorrectly exposed thorugh the
> JDBC escaped function mechanism.  It's not about implementing more
> escaped functions.

Sorry if I was unclear. 

I'll try again: Sateesh addresses those functions in SQL which are
*not* a part of the JDBC escaped-function-set as defined in the JDBC
spec (unless I misinterpreted). I want also to address the functions
defined in the JDBC-spec which have other names (and possibly other
arguments/argument-syntax) in the SQL standard. They're all
implemented today as if the JDBC escaped names are equal to the SQL

Was that clearer?

Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group, 
Staff Engineer, Technical Lead Derby/Java DB
Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway

View raw message