db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernt M. Johnsen" <Bernt.John...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-591) Several builtin functions are incorrectly exposed through the JDBC escaped function syntax {fn <function_call>}
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:56:37 GMT
Moves to the mailing list.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote (2006-02-10
15:54:59):
>     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-591?page=comments#action_12365900 ]


> Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-591:
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> Not sure what you are asking here Bernt. This is a bug reporting
> that several Derby functions are incorrectly exposed thorugh the
> JDBC escaped function mechanism.  It's not about implementing more
> escaped functions.

Sorry if I was unclear. 

I'll try again: Sateesh addresses those functions in SQL which are
*not* a part of the JDBC escaped-function-set as defined in the JDBC
spec (unless I misinterpreted). I want also to address the functions
defined in the JDBC-spec which have other names (and possibly other
arguments/argument-syntax) in the SQL standard. They're all
implemented today as if the JDBC escaped names are equal to the SQL
names.

Was that clearer?

-- 
Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group, 
Staff Engineer, Technical Lead Derby/Java DB
Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway

Mime
View raw message