db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anurag Shekhar (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-940) Add JDBC 4 Wrapper support
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:57:16 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-940?page=comments#action_12365967 ] 

Anurag Shekhar commented on DERBY-940:

>Derby doesn't implement non-standard methods on JDBC objects, that would be against the

In that case won't it be appropriate to leave method unimplemented ? I am assuming the application
trying to get unwrapped object will be the once who are aware what method they can get from
such object. In case an application is expecting derby, it will be aware that derby doesn't
have any no standard method in unwrapped object so will not try to unwrapped object.

> Add JDBC 4 Wrapper support
> --------------------------
>          Key: DERBY-940
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-940
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: New Feature
>     Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>     Assignee: Anurag Shekhar

> As described in the JDBC 4 spec, sections 21 and 3.1.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message