db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Van Couvering (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-983) NetClient JDBC (40) using engine classes
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:14:09 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-983?page=comments#action_12366419 ] 

David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-983:
-------------------------------------------

Actually, I'd like to add that I'm uncomfortable with shorthand methods because this increases
the overall size of the class.  One shorthand method is no big deal, but if this becomes a
pattern that others follow, then we could have a *lot* of shorthand methods, creating code
bloat where we don't really need it.  Just trying to keep in mind one of our key differentiators,
and that's Small Footprint.

David

> NetClient JDBC (40) using engine classes
> ----------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-983
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-983
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Network Client
>  Environment: all
>     Reporter: Anurag Shekhar
>     Assignee: Anurag Shekhar
>  Attachments: derby-983.diff
>
> network client has refrence of 
>  org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.notImplemented ()
> this will cause class not found exception as this class is not part of client jar 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message