db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kathey Marsden <kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-499) Expose BOOLEAN datatype to end users
Date Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:16:43 GMT
Rick Hillegas wrote:

> What if the metadata test internally verified that the version numbers
> from the client driver agreed with the values in dnc.properties? Then
> we wouldn't have to hard code version numbers anywhere: not in the
> test code and not in the canons. We could remove the metadata canons
> from the list in the bumplastdigit target.
I think some centralized location is good  but I think dnc.properties is
maybe not quite right because:

1) It would be pulling the version right out of the jar being tested so
I think that if we did this and plopped down a 10.1 derbyclient.jar, 
the test would pass with a 10.2 derbyTesting.jar.
2)  The test would fail when testing the embedded driver without
3)  When testing the jcc driver, you couldn't really get a version for
getDatabaseProductVersion() because there is no dnc.properties available.

Anyway,  I better get back to these  DRDA patches and  so  I'll end my
journey here on contemplating the cyclical  version testing conundrum.  
Might you consider submitting  a patch to fix the jdk 1.3.1 failures
without the version change?
There was an interesting conversation on the list recently about the
value of separating of patches.  I think  that this is a case where it
is appropriate.



View raw message