db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: patch for jira 499
Date Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:59:09 GMT
Thanks, Dan. I'm having trouble getting the handles on archived 
messages. Kathey sent a message with the following ids:

Kathey Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net>
Subject 	Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-499) Expose BOOLEAN datatype to 
end users
Date 	Fri, 09 Dec 2005 03:19:58 GMT


In that message, she said she was happy with incremental improvements 
and the only objection she wanted addressed was the removal of 
unnecessary datatype constants. In the meantime, Satheesh has replied on 
this email thread that his objections have been addressed.

Thanks for volunteering to commit this patch.

Regards,
-Rick

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

>Rick Hillegas wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I have merged in changes to the mainline which accumulated over the last
>>week. Keeping the patch evergreen involves a certain amount of work and
>>I would appreciate it if a committer could submit this patch soon. I
>>understand that this is a busy time of year for most people on this list.
>>
>>Hi Kathey,
>>
>>I know that you are busy, but could you take 15 minutes to verify that
>>the revised patch satisfies your blocking objection? You wanted me to
>>scrub from DRDAConstants.java the unnecessary extra datatypes. I have
>>done that. If you certify that the patch passes your objection, then
>>another committer may feel confident to follow through on the heavy
>>lifting of checking in these changes.
>>
>>Hi Satheesh,
>>
>>Could you also take 15 minutes to review the parser changes and certify
>>that the patch satisfies your objection?
>>    
>>
>
>I'll look at this patch, but I can't commit it if there's an outstanding
>-1 vote on it. Rick could you provide links in the archive of those two
>objections.
>
>Dan.
>
>  
>


Mime
View raw message