Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46520 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2005 20:07:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2005 20:07:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 15203 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2005 20:07:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 15183 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2005 20:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 15174 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2005 20:07:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:07:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.146] (HELO e6.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:07:01 -0800 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jABK6kvM029331 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:06:46 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id jABK6kPu120650 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:06:46 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jABK6kfk008566 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:06:46 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (svl-arbrown.svl.ibm.com [9.30.40.112]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jABK6js2008519 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:06:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4374F9D4.2040807@sbcglobal.net> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:06:44 -0800 From: Army User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Derby-573 - optimizer overrides changes to metadata.properties and upgrade References: <4374E4DE.6050504@sbcglobal.net> <4374F4DD.6090409@sbcglobal.net> <4374F8B7.8060505@Sourcery.Org> In-Reply-To: <4374F8B7.8060505@Sourcery.Org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > Thanks Army for the good description... But I do think there are SOME metadata > calls that are stored in the database... Yes, you're absolutely right. Just after I sent that last email, I realized one other check that I should have done before clicking "send". I tried deleting the metadata.properties file and I tried deleting the "getProcedures" method from the file, and both failed as expected. But when I went an _changed_ the "getProcedures" method, the changes that I made didn't propagage through--so yes, something is in fact being stored in the tables. Sorry for the misinfo. Yikes, Army