Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76383 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 23:35:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 23:35:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 46979 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 23:35:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46953 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 23:35:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46944 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2005 23:35:36 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:35:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.110.154] (HELO e36.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:35:27 -0800 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA9NZBXC013647 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:35:11 -0500 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jA9NaL78060910 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:36:21 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA9NZAsh007115 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:35:10 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-119-216.mts.ibm.com [9.48.119.216]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA9NZ7IX006989 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:35:09 -0700 Message-ID: <437287A8.7060909@debrunners.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:35:04 +0100 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: DB2JCC, was: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-689) Various improvements to compatibility test. References: <1180820365.1131425840940.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> <43713AE6.2040206@sun.com> <4372216F.3010509@sun.com> <437231AF.2030006@debrunners.com> <43723CD1.1050908@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <43723CD1.1050908@sun.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David W. Van Couvering wrote: > - I don't think we need to do anything extreme like yanking the support > for JCC out of the harness, I think that would be somewhat silly and > unhelpful. Not sure why we would ever do anything like that. If someone contributed changes to the harness that, say, made it easy to run hibernate based tests that would be great. Adding functionality to the harness (or elsewhere) to allow improved testing should be encouraged. Of course you would probably be insane to attempt improving the current harness instead of starting afresh with JUnit tests. :-) But the principle still stands. Dan.