db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oystein.Grov...@Sun.COM (Øystein Grøvlen)
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (DERBY-646) In-memory backend storage support
Date Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:39:08 GMT
>>>>> "SF" == Stephen Fitch <051933f@acadiau.ca> writes:

    SF> Øystein Grøvlen wrote:
    >> (Connecting without specifying StorageFactory
    >> should just use whatever has been booted.)
    >> 
    SF> 3. If  a StorageFactory exists  and a connection is  attempted WITHOUT
    SF> specifying a StorageFactory, and the  StorageFactory in use is NOT the
    SF> default (DirStorageFactory),  throw an Exception. I  think this would
    SF> be   preferred   behavior  because   if   you   connected  with   just
    SF> jdbc:derby:dbname  you would  assume  it would  be  using the  default
    SF> StorageFactory.

I do not agree on this.  I would like to separate the concerns so that
an application does not need to be rewritten to work with different
storage factories.  A special client can be used to boot the database
with the desired StorageFactory.

-- 
Øystein


Mime
View raw message