db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francois Orsini <francois.ors...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-289) Enable code sharing between Derby client and engine
Date Fri, 18 Nov 2005 01:26:07 GMT
I think having 2 embedded Derby or 2 client derby apps at different version
levels in the same JVM is wrong. It is technically feasible but is it
rational? Separate classloaders should be used if one intends to run 2
different versions of embedded derby in the same JVM. Actually, of one of
the embedded application requires a particular version of Derby, this last
one better be first in the classpath - if the second one does not have a
strict requirement on the version of Derby to run, then having 2 different 2
different derby.jar in the classpath is pointless...I thought we had
discussed that different classloaders should be used if 2 different versions
of embedded Derby (or Derby client) should run in the same JVM...

View raw message