db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Closed: (DERBY-110) hsqldb is faster than derby doing inserts
Date Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:37:56 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-110?page=all ]
     
Knut Anders Hatlen closed DERBY-110:
------------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

Closing this issue since no one objected to Olav's proposal.

> hsqldb is faster than derby doing inserts
> -----------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-110
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-110
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Test
>   Components: Performance
>     Versions: 10.0.2.1
>  Environment: CPU 2.40GHz
> windows 2000
>     Reporter: Zhang Jinsheng
>     Priority: Minor

>
> 1. create db name systable in derby and hsqldb (another open source dbms);
> 2. create table named a table ('CREATE TABLE aTable(id INTEGER NOT NULL, name VARCHAR(255)
NOT NULL, description VARCHAR(255))');
> 3. insert ten thousands row in table "atable"
>     for(int i=1; i<10000; i++) {
> 	sql = "INSERT INTO aTable VALUES("+i+", 'haha', 'zhang'' test')";
> 	stmt.execute(sql);
> 	System.out.println(i);
>     }
> 4. derby spend 50390 millisecond;
>    hsqldb spend 4250 millisecond;
>  
> 5. conclusion: hsqldb has more perfect performance.
>    Maybe derby need to improve it's performance.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message