db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lance J. Andersen" <Lance.Ander...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: 10.1.2.1 release (was Re: Please check ksh scripts...)
Date Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:05:40 GMT
I do not see this as a requirement for 10.1.2.1.  I do think we want to 
explore migrating these scripts IMHO.

-lance

Andrew McIntyre wrote:

>
> On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:48 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>
>> The ksh scripts work fine on Solaris (tested tar and zip).
>
>
> Great. (sort of :-) )
>
>> I have found another issue with them, tough. When you just put the
>> script directory in your path and type 'ij.ksh', most unices will use
>> /bin/sh instead of ksh. Under Linux and Cygwin this is fine because
>> /bin/sh actually is Bash, which supports all the ksh commands used in
>> the scripts. Under Solaris and BSD /bin/sh is not Bash, and therefore
>> the scripts fail.
>
>
> Wouldn't a #! be sufficient? I guess you never know for sure...
>
>> I'll file a JIRA issue on this and attach a patch.
>>
>> Sorry I didn't bring it up earlier. (The thing is, I have never
>> actually used the scripts.)
>
>
> Can we agree that this is not a showstopper for 10.1.2.1, considering  
> that this was an issue for 10.1.1.0? I agree that it would be nice to  
> fix so that it works 'out-of-the-box' for everyone, but at some point  
> you need to make a cutoff for fixes, no matter how small. Personally,  
> I think that this is something that can wait for 10.1.3 and/or 10.2,  
> and there are other suggestions completely besides scripts (see  
> Lance's mail about using Ant).
>
> If there are no objections, I think we should target DERBY-667 and  
> DERBY-677 for 10.1.3.0/10.2.0.0 and continue forward with releasing  
> 10.1.2.1.
>
> andrew
>

Mime
View raw message