db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-673) Get rid of the NodeFactory
Date Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:36:38 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-673?page=comments#action_12358697 ] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-673:

Would this change allow some rationalization of the type hierachy for nodes?  Every "node"
is a sub-class of QueryTreeNode, but it seems to me that several nodes are forced into the
hierachy  through the use of the NodeFactory. Any "node" that is really a data element would
seem to fall into this. E.g. TableName, TableElementNode and its sub-classes. It's possible
those nodes do not need to be sub-classes of QueryTreeNode.

> Get rid of the NodeFactory
> --------------------------
>          Key: DERBY-673
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-673
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: New Feature
>     Reporter: Rick Hillegas

> This piece of code once had a purpose in life. It was one of the double-joints which
allowed cloudscape to ship with and without compiler support for the synchronization language.
Synchronization has been removed. If we want to plug in optional language components, I think
there are better ways to do this.
> The NodeFactory turned into a big, sprawling piece of code. At some point this code was
slimmed down by telescoping all of its factory methods into a couple unwieldly, weakly-typed
overloads backed by cumbersome logic in the actual node constructors. I would like to reintroduce
strongly typed node constructors which the parser can call directly. This will make node generation
easier to read and less brittle and it will get rid of the now useless NodeFactory class.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message