Return-Path: 
 <derby-dev-return-9777-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15356 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2005 16:21:32 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2005 16:21:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 12573 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2005 16:21:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12336 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2005 16:21:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:derby-dev-help@db.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <derby-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12327 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2005 16:21:30 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:21:30 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [32.97.182.143] (HELO e3.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.143)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:21:26 -0700
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236])
	by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9RGL7xE017981
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:21:07 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64])
	by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j9RGL6l1039192
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:21:06 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9RGL6HA013110
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:21:06 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-125-205.mts.ibm.com [9.48.125.205])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9RGL53p013044
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:21:06 -0400
Message-ID: <4360FE6E.9010108@debrunners.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:21:02 -0700
From: Daniel John Debrunner <djd@debrunners.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 10.1.2.0 release
References: <435E8AF6.3030803@sbcglobal.net> <wjo87jbzmj2v.fsf@sun.com>
 <43609FEF.6050305@sun.com> <4360CF32.1050001@sbcglobal.net>
 <4360E3E3.9030705@sun.com> <4360E8B2.3040503@sbcglobal.net>
 <B8FA97B7-981C-4142-8AFC-45E4C5E14FAB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8FA97B7-981C-4142-8AFC-45E4C5E14FAB@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Andrew McIntyre wrote:

> As for the linefeeds, I think the correct solution is to fix up the 
> line feeds for the tars and not the zips using Ant's <FixCRLF> task.  I
> believe that for shell-emulation environments on Windows that the 
> linefeeds should still be CRLF, not LF, but could somebody confirm that?

That seems to be heading down a path of different versions for different
platforms. That would be a new departure and possibly not the correct
thing for a bug fix release.

Dan.