Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61162 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2005 16:58:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2005 16:58:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 55827 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2005 16:58:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55796 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2005 16:58:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55784 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2005 16:58:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:58:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.98.34] (HELO brmea-mail-3.sun.com) (192.18.98.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:58:11 -0700 Received: from phys-epost-1 ([129.159.136.14]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j97Gvj1L007579 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:57:46 -0600 (MDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com by epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) id <0IO0004010OV6A@epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com> (original mail from Dag.Wanvik@Sun.COM) for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:57:45 +0200 (MEST) Received: from khepri05.norway.sun.com (khepri05.Norway.Sun.COM [129.159.112.194]) by epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IO000EJ81S85T@epost-mail1.sweden.sun.com>; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:57:45 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:57:44 +0200 From: "Dag H. Wanvik" Subject: Re: updatable resultSet In-reply-to: <43469495.9000502@sbcglobal.net> To: Derby Development Cc: Mamta Satoor Reply-to: Dag.Wanvik@Sun.COM Message-id: <17222.43272.88328.821095@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.16 under Emacs 21.4.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <4344403B.7020209@infologic.fr> <87ek6z7izl.fsf@solstorm.hatlen.net> <43444A0C.4040400@infologic.fr> <43444B34.60208@infologic.fr> <43444F43.2000906@Sourcery.Org> <4344B5DF.9030709@infologic.fr> <43452BE6.5020304@sbcglobal.net> <43455E16.7060204@Sourcery.Org> <43456E21.4010602@infologic.fr> <43457A5C.3050004@Sourcery.Org> <434638AF.10906@infologic.fr> <17222.28086.522331.225833@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <43469495.9000502@sbcglobal.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Kathey, >>>>> "Kathey" == Kathey Marsden wrote: Kathey> DERBY-605 currently seems to combine several issues and its summary is Kathey> not that descriptive of what needs implementation. Kathey> I wonder should we have multiple Jira entries that match the Kathey> functionality that needs implementation, one for scrollable ResultSets Kathey> for large objects with client, another for updatable ResultSets for Kathey> large objects with client, etc. Dag what are the various issues that Kathey> you see here, and how would you recommend breaking them up in Jira? Kathey> Kathey> Kathey> FYI, here is the doc page with the differences between client and Kathey> embedded for updatable ResultSets. Kathey> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.1/adminguide/radminappsresultsetdiffs.html Yes, I agree with you, we need to break this (JIRA-605) down in several issues. Here is one way: 1 Forward-only updatable, update: 1.1 c/s: lobs 2 Forward-only updatable, update: 2.1 c/s: remaining problems in update{String, Bytes, Time, Object} 3 Forward-only updatable, insert: now JIRA-100 , could split this in three: 3.1 embedded 3.2 c/s minus lobs 3.3 c/s lobs 4 scrollable updatable sensitive 4.1 embedded (incl lobs) 4.2 c/s minus lobs 4.3 c/s lobs 5 scrollable updatable insensitive (if we ever want do that) I would assume 3.1 and 4.1 could include lobs. We can cross-link all of these to 605. Does 2.1 need splitting? Maybe Mamta can comment on that? Scrollable updatable (4.2) will face the problems under 2.1 also, but any solution should carry over, I suppose. Also, a solution to 1.1 should apply to 4.3. I think it is still ok to keep these as separate issues. I think some exisiting JIRA issues touch on one or more of these (in addition to 100 and 506, I'll start looking...) Once we get these organized I can post an overview on the Wiki. What do you think? Thanks, Dag