Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33113 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2005 16:22:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2005 16:22:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 45091 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2005 16:22:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45055 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2005 16:22:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45041 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2005 16:22:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:22:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [222.146.51.83] (HELO smtp.basil.ocn.ne.jp) (222.146.51.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:22:09 -0700 Received: from Arkat (p4150-adsan11honb5-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [61.214.217.150]) by smtp.basil.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC0F3789 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:21:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.344 [267.12.0]); Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:24:39 +0900 Message-ID: <011401c5d1a4$f0fde520$0800a8c0@Arkat> From: "TomohitoNakayama" To: "Derby Development" Subject: Reply-To header in mail from derby-ml Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:24:38 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all. It seems that there are no Reply-To header in mail from derby-ml since 10/15 . As a result , responce to mail of derby-ml was sent to sender of original mail . Does anyone know any information ? Configuration of ml was changed for some reason ? Best regards. /* Tomohito Nakayama tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp tmnk@apache.org Naka http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html */