db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Myrna van Lunteren <m.v.lunte...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New Proposed 10.1 snapshot (was Re: lang/wisconsin.sql)
Date Wed, 05 Oct 2005 22:19:26 GMT
Out of curiosity - is there anything helpful in derby.log?
Myrna
 On 10/5/05, Deepa Remesh <dremesh@gmail.com> wrote:

> I ran derbyall with J2ME/CDC/FP with the new snapshot. 3 tests failed.
> I have attached the diff for failures.
>
> * derbyall/derbyall.fail:jdbcapi/metadataJdbc20.java (needs master file
> update)
> * derbyall/storeall/storeall.fail:store/oc_rec1.java
> (java.lang.IllegalStateException)
> * derbyall/storeall/storeall.fail:store/oc_rec3.java
> (java.lang.IllegalStateException)
>
> The stack trace for IllegalStateException from .tmp files:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException:
> at java.util.zip.ZipFile.getEntryImpl(Native Method)
> at java.util.zip.ZipFile.getEntry(ZipFile.java:142)
> at java.util.jar.JarFile.getEntry(JarFile.java:307)
> at java.util.jar.JarFile.getJarEntry(JarFile.java:209)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClassImpl(URLClassLoader.java:928)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$4.run(URLClassLoader.java:557)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:167)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:555)
>
> Has anyone seen this before?
>
> I tried to run the failed online compress tests individually but
> looking at the tests, I think they have to be run in sequence. So I
> ran just storeall suite and the tests oc_rec1.java and oc_rec3.java
> passed. I am not sure if these failures are intermittent. If anyone
> who has more knowledge of these tests can look into this and tell if
> this could be a problem in test/code, it would be great.
>
> Thanks,
> Deepa
>
> On 10/5/05, Kathey Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> >
> > >Kathey Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net> writes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Running derbyall with the 10.1 jars made with a sane build (svn
> > >>292855), I am seeing a difference in plan for lang/wisconsin.sql in
> > >>embedded. If I run the test independently it passes.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >I tried to run the test independently with your snapshot, and it
> > >failed.
> > >
> > Thanks Knut for looking at this. I finally gave up on that snapshot
> > and made a new proposed snapshot based on SVN 292855.
> > http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/snapshot/
> >
> > I still have no idea what the problem was with wisconsin but derbyall on
> > Windows runs cleanly with the new one.
> > Also the same build has expected results on Ole's page.
> > http://db.apache.org/derby/derby_tests.html
> >
> > I will go ahead and bump the version. The only issue with the version
> > is that there was a test change checked in yesterday (DERBY-459)
> > which is not in the snapshot but got put in before the version bump.
> >
> > Deepa could you try this with J2ME? If anyone else can give the
> > snapshot a try before we post it that would be great.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Kathey
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message