db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: VOTE: Principles of sharing code
Date Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:44:22 GMT
I am still learning, so forgive me if I missed something, but I 
carefully read the guidelines of our project:


"Changes to the products of the Project, including code and 
documentation, will appear as action items in the status file. All 
product changes to the currently active repository are subject to lazy 


"An action requiring consensus approval must receive at least 3 binding 
+1 votes and no binding vetos. An action requiring majority approval 
must receive at least 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 
votes. ==My emphasis== All other action items are considered to have 
lazy approval until somebody votes -1, after which point they are 
decided by either consensus or majority vote, depending on the type of 
action item.== end emphasis =="

Given that this is a change to the products of the Product, and nobody 
has voted -1, then I thought this meant lazy approval.  Lazy approval is 
further described in the Apache Way:


"When coordination is required, decisions are taken with a lazy 
consensus approach: a few positive votes with no negative vote is enough 
to get going."

My understanding is that binding votes are only relevant when someone 
votes -1...



Kathey Marsden wrote:
> David W. Van Couvering wrote:
>>Hi, all.  I wanted to let you know I plan to close the polls on this
>>vote Friday midnight USA Pacific Time.
> I haven't actually seen any binding votes on this proposal yet. But may
> have missed them.

View raw message