db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-516) Need to incorporate client backward/forward compatibility testing into testing procedures.
Date Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:05:48 GMT
Why yes it is, thanks.  I remove my suggestion.

David

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> David W. Van Couvering wrote:
> 
> 
>>I like to start by applying a patch to the revision level that the patch
>>was built with.  That way I can make very sure I applied things
>>correctly -- I can diff the output of svn status and svn diff with what
>>the contributor provided.  This is especially important when the
>>contribution includes files that are added (especially new empty files
>>like empty test master files), which I actually have to add by hand.
>>
>>Once that looks good, I do an svn update with no -r option to update the
>>tree to the head of the trunk.  If at this point I get errors, then,
>>yes, I would complain to the contributor, but I want to make sure I
>>applied the patch correctly first.
>>
>>Maybe that's not how everyone does it, but that's how I like to do it,
>>so that's why I was suggesting the revision number.  I can also do it by
>>date, but the revision number is more accurate.
> 
> 
> Ok sounds fine, isn't the svn revision in the svn diff output though?
> 
> Dan.
> 

Mime
View raw message