db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Proposal about creating shared component (Re: Questions about what is module to be shared (Re: Discussions on Wik ... ))
Date Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:30:00 GMT
Weird Freudian slip.  I meant "up to a vote" not "up to avoid."  Sorry...

David W. Van Couvering wrote:
> OK, I am proposing that addition of any new packages to a shared 
> component be up to avoid.  Addition of new classes or methods to an 
> existing shared package should not require a vote.
> 
> Does that sound reasonable?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David
> 
> TomohitoNakayama wrote:
> 
>> Hello.
>> Kathey Marsden wrote :
>>
>>> I think the code submission for any new shared
>>> component should require a vote.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think there remains need to think about definition of  "new shared 
>> component" in this context .
>> Is it new *.java file to be shared ? Or new package to be shared ?
>>
>> I think we should wait for the shared component guidelines page to be 
>> updated by David , then discuss the definition.
>>
>> Best regards .
>>
>> /*
>>
>>         Tomohito Nakayama
>>         tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp
>>         tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp
>>         tmnk@apache.org
>>
>>         Naka
>>         http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
>>
>> */

Mime
View raw message