db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "TomohitoNakayama" <tomon...@basil.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject Re: Questions about what is component to be shared (Re: Discussions on Wik ... )
Date Sat, 08 Oct 2005 06:08:55 GMT
Hello.

Sorry ...
Not module, but component.

Best regareds.

/*

         Tomohito Nakayama
         tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp
         tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp
         tmnk@apache.org

         Naka
         http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html

*/
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "TomohitoNakayama" <tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp>
To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 2:59 PM
Subject: Questions about what is module to be shared (Re: Discussions on Wik ... )


> Hello.
> 
> I post my questions around shared module.
> 
> What is the modules to be shread ?
> 
> David shows me the list of modules to be shared in next url.
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/ListOfSharedComponent
> 
> However, David justs lists them (At least I recognized as so) and,
> I think we need to think about this list in order to make it clear what is the module
to be shared .
> 
> At first, I think we should think next :
> * Definition of each element in the lists.
> 
> And I think what we need to be careful about is as next :
> * Is granularity of this list reasonable as shared module ?
> * Are there any other elements which should be included in this lists ?
> * Is it possible to share the element as the shared module ?
> 
> Best regards .
> 
> /*
> 
>         Tomohito Nakayama
>         tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp
>         tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp
>         tmnk@apache.org
> 
>         Naka
>         http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
> 
> */
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM>
> To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 5:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Discussions on Wiki - WAS Re: SQL functions, procedures and PSM - a possible
approach
> 
> 
>> Hi, Tomohito.  It would be great if you could summarize your concerns in 
>> email and we can continue our discussion on the list.
>> 
>> If it would help, I'm also more than open for you and I to have an IRC 
>> conversation, log it, and send the log out to the list.  We do seem to 
>> be a bit stuck :)
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> TomohitoNakayama wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>> 
>>> I understand. Sorry for disturbing .
>>> I had come to feel difficulties in discussing at Wiki.
>>> 
>>> Should I ask David my question in mailing list once more ?
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> 
>>> /*
>>> 
>>>         Tomohito Nakayama
>>>         tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp
>>>         tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp
>>>         tmnk@apache.org
>>> 
>>>         Naka
>>>         http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
>>> 
>>> */
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David W. Van Couvering" 
>>> <David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM>
>>> To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:40 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Discussions on Wiki - WAS Re: SQL functions, procedures and 
>>> PSM - a possible approach
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I'm getting a little concerned, it feels a little quiet over there in 
>>>> the corner with Tomohito and I, and I was about to propose with 
>>>> Tomohito that we move it back to the list.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> David W. Van Couvering wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> This sounds great, Dan!  Is this a good candidate for putting up
on the
>>>>>> Wiki site as a proposal?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone else concerned by the movement of discussion to the wiki for
>>>>> the common code stuff? The Apache way is for discussions to occur on
the
>>>>> mailing lists. It seems to me that the wiki is a great way to summarize
>>>>> such discussions, but not to hold them. A wiki page related to a
>>>>> discussion can provide a very useful single overview, something that
>>>>> does get lost in mailings as the discussion spreads out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/123 - Release Date: 2005/10/06
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
>


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07


Mime
View raw message