Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <431DE6A5.4030005@acadiau.ca>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 15:57:41 -0300
From: Philip Wilder <050503w@acadiau.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derby Development <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-518) Data type mismatch error for boolean
 to DECIMAL conversion in J2ME
References: <831592197.1125442985250.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
	 <43159AF8.40806@acadiau.ca>
 <58ed70f505083111388096354@mail.gmail.com>	 <43160C2A.5090402@acadiau.ca>
 <58ed70f505083113565a8e207@mail.gmail.com> <43161E96.5030905@debrunners.com>
 <4316EDA4.8070909@acadiau.ca> <43172EED.7060507@acadiau.ca>
 <43172FB7.4070707@acadiau.ca> <431DCC47.20003@acadiau.ca>
 <431DCEF0.5090703@sbcglobal.net> <431DD9A4.90007@acadiau.ca>
 <431DE1BF.2010105@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <431DE1BF.2010105@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kathey Marsden wrote:

>Philip Wilder wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>Thanks Philip. I will look at getting this checked into the trunk.  When
>>>you say port this, do you mean port DERBY-213?  
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Yes, although now that you mention it such a port does have the
>>potential to be tricky. Since this is a patch of a patch should svn
>>merge also be done in two stages or should I just refrain entirely?
>>    
>>
>
>
>Two svn merges is not what worries me about porting DERBY-213.   I am a
>little concerned about  the port because of the risk level of the
>change.    There was a thread earlier today that said.
>
>  
>
>>what I do know is that when you RE-EXECUTE a statement
>>you get a new ResultSet, but you don't automatically close the previous
>>ResultSet. So if you create multiple ResultSets from the same
>>statement before you close it, ResultSets will be leaked, at least
>>temporarily.
>>    
>>
>
>There is no bug filed yet, but if that is true, no longer closing the ResultSet for forward only cursors could exacerbate the leak and cause existing applications that don't leak to start leaking.  I think it might be better to wait a bit before porting to 10.1.
>
>Kathey
>  
>
Understood.

Philip