db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew McIntyre <mcintyr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: VOTE: Approach for sharing code
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:02:13 GMT
On 9/9/05, Daniel John Debrunner <djd@debrunners.com> wrote:
>
> > Thinking of this in the same light as an obfuscator, I sort of thought
> > of the rename/copy  coming much later and only for the jar build.
> 
> [rest snipped]
> 
> I would be very tempted to veto any approach that had the jars
> containing different code to that built in the classes directory and
> usually(?) used for testing by developers. I believe it increases the
> chance for problems being introduced in this process but not caught.

Does this mean you would object to both of Kathey's proposed options?
Obfuscator-type modification of the binaries, or ant-based
preprocessing of the source? It wasn't totally clear from this mail if
that was the case.

andrew

Mime
View raw message