db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: JUnit license, was: subversion etiquette]
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:25:24 GMT
Hi David,

I think you're right. In any event, I was hoping to checkin an empty canon.


David W. Van Couvering wrote:

> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> I was hoping that the first point could be accomplished by some 
>> jiggery pokery which ran the compatibility suite under the normal 
>> (non-junit) test harness, producing a canon. This wouldn't wrench the 
>> existing machinery around too much. However, it would require 
>> developers to download the junit jar so that the test class would 
>> build and execute...and this may be controversial.
> I don't think that the existing harness *requires* output to a canon, 
> does it?  I was working on a unit test for exceptions which produced 
> no output, and as long as I had an empty master file the test harness 
> was satisfied.

View raw message