db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: JUnit license, was: subversion etiquette]
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:50:02 GMT

Rick Hillegas wrote:

> Hi Dan,
> I was hoping that the first point could be accomplished by some 
> jiggery pokery which ran the compatibility suite under the normal 
> (non-junit) test harness, producing a canon. This wouldn't wrench the 
> existing machinery around too much. However, it would require 
> developers to download the junit jar so that the test class would 
> build and execute...and this may be controversial.
I don't think that the existing harness *requires* output to a canon, 
does it?  I was working on a unit test for exceptions which produced no 
output, and as long as I had an empty master file the test harness was 

View raw message