db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremy Boynes <jboy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: VOTE: Approach for sharing code
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:52:30 GMT
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>>>
>>>I would be very tempted to veto any approach that had the jars
>>>containing different code to that built in the classes directory and
>>>usually(?) used for testing by developers. I believe it increases the
>>>chance for problems being introduced in this process but not caught.
>>
>>
>>Does this mean you would object to both of Kathey's proposed options?
>>Obfuscator-type modification of the binaries, or ant-based
>>preprocessing of the source? It wasn't totally clear from this mail if
>>that was the case.
> 
> 
> Both, any solution where the content of the jar files does not match the
> content of a non-jar build.
> 

I'm with Dan on this - one of the advantages we have is openness and 
post-compilation modification of the binary is quite the opposite.

--
Jeremy

Mime
View raw message