db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@debrunners.com>
Subject Re: VOTE: Approach for sharing code
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:44:48 GMT
Andrew McIntyre wrote:

> On 9/9/05, Daniel John Debrunner <djd@debrunners.com> wrote:
>>>Thinking of this in the same light as an obfuscator, I sort of thought
>>>of the rename/copy  coming much later and only for the jar build.
>>[rest snipped]
>>I would be very tempted to veto any approach that had the jars
>>containing different code to that built in the classes directory and
>>usually(?) used for testing by developers. I believe it increases the
>>chance for problems being introduced in this process but not caught.
> Does this mean you would object to both of Kathey's proposed options?
> Obfuscator-type modification of the binaries, or ant-based
> preprocessing of the source? It wasn't totally clear from this mail if
> that was the case.

Both, any solution where the content of the jar files does not match the
content of a non-jar build.


View raw message