Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8046 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2005 10:24:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2005 10:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 58562 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2005 10:24:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 58506 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2005 10:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 58475 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2005 10:24:29 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 03:24:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [206.201.23.30] (HELO lng002.tsacorp.com) (206.201.23.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 03:24:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42B75305.8030404@sun.com> To: "Derby Development" Subject: Re: DRDA Password Encryption (SECMEC_EUSRIDPWD and SECMEC_USRENCPWD) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004 From: sissonj@insession.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:24:25 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on lng002/SVR/TSA(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 08/02/2005 05:23:16, Serialize complete at 08/02/2005 05:23:16 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00392953CA257051_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 00392953CA257051_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" David Van Couvering wrote on 21/06/2005 09:36:37 AM: > It looks like there are a lot of separate issues around client/server > security. Perhaps we should open a top-level JIRA issue and then create > sub-tasks that identify each of these? That would allow someone or > someones interested in improving security to have a one-stop-shop to > understand what needs to be fixed... > > Thanks, > > David > Sounds like a good idea to me. John --=_alternative 00392953CA257051_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
David Van Couvering <David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM> wrote on 21/06/2005 09:36:37 AM:

> It looks like there are a lot of separate issues around client/server
> security.  Perhaps we should open a top-level JIRA issue and then create
> sub-tasks that identify each of these?  That would allow someone or
> someones interested in improving security to have a one-stop-shop to
> understand what needs to be fixed...
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>

Sounds like a good idea to me.

John --=_alternative 00392953CA257051_=--