Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68904 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2005 22:38:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2005 22:38:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 82102 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2005 22:38:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 82066 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2005 22:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 82052 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2005 22:38:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:38:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,SPF_HELO_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.143] (HELO e3.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.143) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:39:01 -0700 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7TMchNS020088 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:38:43 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j7TMceOn092500 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:38:43 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7TKq2m8006890 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:52:02 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-125-85.mts.ibm.com [9.48.125.85]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7TKpwL0006751 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:52:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4313756C.2060107@sbcglobal.net> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:51:56 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: Bugs and 10.1.2 release References: <4310AA29.8000403@sbcglobal.net> <431349C0.4000101@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <431349C0.4000101@sun.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rick Hillegas wrote: > > This sounds like a reasonable plan. By the way, what happened to the > discussions about having a regular release schedule? I proposed October because it seemed like a reasonable amount of time to get some bugs fixed. I think in general anyone can propose a release at any time. If there is consensus that there should be a release, someone volunteers to be release manager, folks scramble to finish up, testing and votes ensue, and we have a release. That said, I think your proposed schedules both sound reasonable and healthy for the project. It will just take volunteers to manage those releases. So far Andrew has been kind enough to carry the torch, but I am guessing he's getting tired #:) A couple of links of interest on the topic: DB Guidelines - http://db.apache.org/decisions.html Sample project guidelines http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html Kathey