Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97532 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2005 22:31:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2005 22:31:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 79615 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2005 22:31:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 79572 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2005 22:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 79559 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2005 22:31:21 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:31:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,SPF_HELO_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.142] (HELO e2.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:31:40 -0700 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7IMVHdC006632 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:31:17 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j7IMVHH6194376 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:31:17 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7IMVH01010547 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:31:17 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-127-168.mts.ibm.com [9.48.127.168]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7IMVEkK010418 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:31:16 -0400 Message-ID: <43050C31.2000405@sbcglobal.net> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:31:13 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: jira question References: <42E97A33.2020204@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <42E97A33.2020204@sun.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rick Hillegas wrote: > I added comments to two bugs this week (171 and 455) and was hoping > that Jira would post these comments to the developer's list. In > particular, I was hoping that my comment on 455 (expression indexes) > would invite further discussion by the Store experts. Alas, Jira did > not post my comments. Would appreciate theories about how I am > mis-using Jira. > Hi Rick, I was wondering if you had had any luck straightening out the mail problem. Looking at DERBY-289, I see you made comments that. I never got in email. Don't want to miss anything you have to say! Kathey