db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oystein.Grov...@Sun.COM (Øystein Grøvlen)
Subject Re: Migration from to 10.1
Date Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:30:04 GMT
>>>>> "DJD" == Daniel John Debrunner <djd@debrunners.com> writes:

    DJD> Fully functioning engine in soft upgrade mode, except for the new
    DJD> features that would leave persistent data that would not be understood
    DJD> by an older release. For 10.1 that would be SYNONYMS etc.

    DJD> Ie. multi-user, read/write. The intention is that applications can try
    DJD> out the new engine version with no changes and see if it fixes bugs or
    DJD> improves (or degrades) performance.

Is there any performance impact of doing soft-upgrade? That is, does
it imply data conversion from/to old data format, or is this avoided
by making the class loading dependent on the data format?


View raw message