db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francois Orsini <francois.ors...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: drda datatypes
Date Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:28:05 GMT
I think it's worth investigating option #1 to try and get some idea of
when these types could be added - getting in touch with Open Group and
start some dialogue (Kathey seems to have a contact) - Option #2 could
be done in parallel IMO...just some thoughts...

Now if the current DRDA client driver is used to communicate with a
data source different than Derby and the application is making use of
these non-officially supported types, this case would have to be


On 8/15/05, Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hillegas@sun.com> wrote:
> According to the January 2004 rev of the DRDA spec, DRDA does not
> support the following SQL datatypes which we want to support or already
> partially support:
> How do we move forward to support these types? Here are some
> suggestions. What do you think?
> 1) Wait until the spec owner (Open Group) adds these to a future rev of
> DRDA. We would lobby Open Group to do this.
> 2) Create our own, custom-rev of DRDA which supports these datatypes.
> Jim Gray seems to think that the spirit of DRDA allows these
> customizations (see the following paper:
> research.microsoft.com/~gray/papers/SqlAccessVsDrda.doc ). In this
> scheme, Derby 10.2 clients and servers would ship with support for the
> new datatypes. 10.2 servers would have to do something creative when
> 10.1 or db2jcc clients accessed these datatypes.
> 3) Support some other data interchange format, either alongside or in
> place of DRDA.
> -Rick

View raw message